Home >> Application >> By Standard >> ASTM >> ASTM E-F >> ASTM F88 Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier Materials

ASTM F88 Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier Materials

Share:

ASTM F88 Flexible Barrier Material Seal Strength Tester | UnitedTest

UnitedTest manufactures professional ASTM F88 compliant seal strength testing machines, specially designed for accurate quality testing and performance verification of flexible barrier packaging materials across packaging manufacturing and laboratory inspection industries.


ASTM F88 Standard Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier Materials is the globally recognized industry standard used to quantify the seal strength performance of flexible barrier packaging materials. This standardized testing method evaluates the durability and bonding reliability of thermal heat-sealed joints and adhesive-bonded joints for various packaging structures.


The ASTM F88 seal strength test applies to multiple substrate combinations, including flexible-to-flexible, flexible-to-rigid, and flexible-to-semi-rigid packaging assemblies. By peeling standardized cut test strips under controlled test conditions, the equipment precisely records real-time separation force values and analyzes different seal failure modes. It provides reliable, repeatable test data for packaging seal formula optimization, heat sealing parameter adjustment, incoming material quality control, and finished packaging product certification.


Test Principle

A strip of sealed material is cut so that the seal runs across its width. The two "tails" (legs) on either side of the seal are clamped into the opposing grips of a tensile testing machine. The grips are then driven apart at a constant rate, progressively peeling the seal. The machine records force versus grip travel throughout the separation.

Two values can be extracted from the resulting curve:

Maximum seal strength — the peak force per unit width encountered during separation.

Average seal strength — the average force per unit width, typically calculated over the central 80% of the peel (i.e., discarding the first 10% and last 10% of the force–displacement curve).

A critical nuance: the force measured is not purely "seal strength." A portion of the measured force may be a bending component arising from the mechanics of how the specimen tails are held. To control this bending, the standard defines three tail-holding techniques, and consistent use of one technique throughout a test series is strongly recommended.


Specific Test Methods — The Three Techniques

TechniqueNameDescriptionTypical Application
Technique AUnsupportedEach tail is secured in opposing grips; the seal remains unsupported during the test.Flexible-to-flexible or semi-rigid seals
Technique BSupported 90° (By Hand)

Tails in opposing grips; the seal is hand-supported at 90° to the tails.

Contact must be loose — only preventing vertical tail movement, never gripping.

Flexible-to-flexible or semi-rigid seals
Technique CSupported 180°

For flexible-to-flexible: the least flexible tail is laid flat against a rigid alignment plate held in one grip;

the more flexible tail is folded 180° over the seal and held in the opposing grip. 

For rigid/semi-rigid applications: the package structure itself is maintained and fixtured.

Flexible-to-flexible, or flexible-to-rigid/semi-rigid where the rigid side is kept intact

ASTM F88 Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier Materials


Test Equipment required for ASTM F88 Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier Materials: 

Tensile testing machine

Uniform adjustable jaw separation speed range: 200–300 mm/min (8–12 in/min).

Force measurement accuracy of ±2% full load scale; software capable of plotting force-displacement curves and calculating average force over a defined curve segment.

Specimen Grips

Non-slip gripping jaws to evenly distribute tensile stress and eliminate specimen slippage during peeling. 

Optional custom fixtures: alignment backing plates, tray holding jigs, perimeter clamping fixtures to stabilize rigid/semi-rigid tray samples and reduce test variability.

Specimen Cutting Device

Conforms to ASTM D882 cutter specifications, designed to produce clean, perpendicular-edged strips with standardized widths: 15 mm, 25 mm (1 in / 25.4 mm, preferred).

 Clean cuts prevent pre-damage to seal edges that skews strength readings.

 

Detailed Test Specimen Specifications

Fin Seal / Hot Wire Seal: Single sealed strip with 76 mm (3 in) free tail length, standard width 25.4 mm (1 in).

Lap Seal: Central sealed band with 76 mm free tail extending from both sides of the seal; minimum 3 mm un-separated border on either side of the seal line.

Seal width (X) is the critical test dimension and varies by heat-sealer tool geometry.

ASTM F88 Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier Materials

All cuts must be perpendicular to the seal line to avoid uneven peeling forces.

For flexible-lid-on-rigid-tray samples: Either cut fully through both flexible lid and rigid flange, or slice only the flexible lid while leaving the rigid tray flange intact; all comparative testing must use identical cutting methodology.

No fixed minimum specimen count; sampling quantity must be statistically representative of production batches (30 replicates recommended for interlaboratory precision testing, minimum 10 for routine QC).


Core Test Parameters & Stipulations

Fixed Mandatory Test Parameters

Jaw separation speed: 200–300 mm/min (8–12 in/min); studies confirm no meaningful strength variation within this range.

Average force calculation rule: Only use the central 80% of the full peel curve (exclude initial 10% ramp-up and final 10% post-failure drop) to ignore unstable startup and specimen breakage data.

Failure Mode Classification

Mandatory visual documentation of all failure modes for every specimen:

Adhesive peel: Clean separation at the seal interface (target for peelable packaging).

Cohesive peel: Split within the sealant layer (indicates robust interface bonding).

Delamination: Internal splitting of multi-layer flexible film substrates.

Material break / remote break: Film tears outside the sealed zone (interference, not true seal failure).

Material elongation: Extreme stretching of flexible tails during pulling.


Step-by-Step Standard Test Procedures

1, Cut uniform test strips perpendicular to the seal line with a precision cutter; inspect for edge damage to the seal.

2, Record sample metadata: seal location, material construction, cutting method, initial grip separation distance.

3, Center the specimen laterally in the jaws, align seal line perpendicular to pull direction, leave minimal slack without pre-stressing the seal.

4, Assign the less flexible substrate to the moving jaw for uniform peeling; document which material is mounted in upper/lower grips.

5, Select the appropriate peel technique (A/B/C) and mount any required alignment fixtures.

6, Start the machine at a constant separation rate of 200–300 mm/min, continuously record force-displacement curve until full seal separation.

7, Mark peak maximum force value on the curve; calculate average peel force using the central 80% curve segment if separation occurs via seal peeling.

8, Visually identify and record all failure modes for the specimen.

9, Repeat for all replicate samples, segregating edge-cut specimens from central strip samples if testing tray flange seals.


Industrial Application Fields

ASTM F88 is the global primary standard for flexible barrier packaging quality control and validation across these sectors:

Medical Sterile Packaging: Tyvek, foil, plastic film peelable sterile pouches (required compliance for ISO 11607 medical device packaging validation).

Food & Beverage Flexible Packaging: Heat-sealed snack bags, frozen food pouches, retort packaging, lidded plastic food trays.

Pharmaceutical Blister & Sachet Packaging: Unit-dose drug foil sachets, blister pack lid seals.

Consumer Goods Packaging: Cosmetic foil pouches, detergent refill bags, disposable single-use product sachets.

Electronics Protective Barrier Films: Moisture-barrier foil-laminated component packaging.

Packaging R&D & Manufacturing QC: New sealant formulation screening, heat-seal process parameter optimization, batch consistency inspection, shelf-life aging validation.


Related test standard:

ISO 11339Adhesives — T-peel test for flexible-to-flexible bonded assemblies
ASTM F88Standard Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier Materials
GB/T 2791Adhesives,T peel strengthtest method for a flexible-to-flexible test specimen assembly
ASTM D1876Standard Test Method for Peel Resistance of Adhesives (T-Peel Test)
ISO 4587Adhesives - Determination of tensile lap-shear strength of rigid-to-rigid bonded assemblies
ISO 8510-2Adhesives - Peel test for a flexible-bonded-to-rigid test specimen assembly - Part 2: 180° peel
GB/T 2790

Adhesives, 180°peel strength test method for a flexible-bonded-to-rigid test specimen assembly

ASTM F2824Mechanical seal strength for full round container lids (distinguished from F88’s cut strip testing)


ASTM F88 vs. ASTM F2824 — Quick Comparison

FeatureASTM F88ASTM F2824
ScopeMeasures strength of seals in flexible barrier materialsMeasures mechanical seal strength while separating an entire lid
SpecimenA strip cut from the seal (portion of seal)Entire lid peeled from round cup/bowl container
Pull angleDetermined by technique (A: free, B: 90°, C: 180°)45° (other angles allowed with documentation)
ContainerAny flexible, semi-rigid, or rigid seal; strip samplingSpecifically round (cups, bowls); can be adapted to oval/rectangular
OutputPeak and/or average force per unit widthContinuous and maximum force across the entire seal
Primary useProcess validation, QC, material comparisonEvaluating seal consistency across full perimeter


Keywords: UnitedTest ASTM F88 tester, ASTM F88 seal strength tester, flexible barrier material seal strength test machine, packaging heat seal strength testing equipment, ASTM F88 flexible packaging peel seal strength test, thermal heat sealed joint failure mode analysis machine, flexible rigid barrier packaging adhesive bond tester, packaging manufacturing seal quality control equipment, flexible barrier material separation force testing instrument

Related products and device

ASTM F88 Flexible Barrier Materials Tensile Testing Machine

WDW Series Computer Control Electronic Universal Testing Machine made by UNITEDTEST range from 100N to 600KN load capacity with various models like single columns, table type, door frame type etc., is used to perform tension, compression, flexure/bending, shearing, peeling etc., test for metal and nonmetal specimens.

ASTM F88 Seal strength T peeling test fixture

T-Peel Resistance Test Fixture for Adhesives is based on ASTM D1876 standard, used to measure the adhesion strength of adhesive maeterial. ASTM D1876 peel strength test method is commonly used to measure the strength of adhesive bonds between two sealed materials.

ASTM F88 Peel adhesion test fixture of self-adhesive tapes

Peel adhesion test fixture of self-adhesive tapes is based on the standard ISO 29862, It is a professional device used to test the peel strength of tapes, adhesives,It mainly simulates the peeling process in actual usage scenarios to obtain key parameters such as peel force and and fracture value.

Related Standard

ISO 11339 T-peel test for Adhesives

ISO 11339 Adhesives — T-peel test for flexible-to-flexible bonded assemblies.

It specifies a T‑peel test for the determination of the peel resistance of an adhesive by measuring the peeling force of a T‑shaped bonded assembly of two flexible adherends.  The ISO 11339 test method is suitable for self-adhesive tapes that are prepared under the relevant guidelines within this test standard. For a T-peel test for a flexible-to-flexible assembly, the force is applied to the unbonded ends of the specimen . The angle between the bond line and the direction of the applied force is not fixed. 

ISO 4587 Adhesives Tensile Shear Test of rigid bond material

ISO 4587 Adhesives — Determination of tensile lap-shear strength of rigid-to-rigid bonded assemblies

ISO 4587 determining tensile lap-shear strength of adhesive single-lap joints between two rigid substrates, for comparative evaluation rather than structural engineering design data. UnitedTest manufactures high-precision ISO 4587 compliant lap-shear test machines, designed to evaluate the tensile shear performance of rigid-to-rigid adhesive bonded assemblies for industrial quality control and adhesive material comparison. 

ASTM D6862 90 Degree Peel Resistance Test of Adhesives

ASTM D6862 test method covers the determination of the resistance-to-peel strength of an adhesive bond between one rigid adherend and one flexible adherend when tested at an angle of approximately 90 degrees under specified conditions of preparation and testing.

A variation in thickness of the adherends will generally influence test values. For this reason, the thickness of the adherends used to make the test specimens shall be specified in the material specification. When no thickness is specified, the flexible adherend shall be 0.60 mm (0.025 in.) thick and the rigid adherend shall be 1.60 mm (0.060 in.) thick.


ASTM D1876 T-Peel Resistance Test of Adhesives

ASTM D1876: Standard Test Method for Peel Resistance of Adhesives (T-Peel Test)


ASTM D1876 test method is primarily intended for determining the relative peel resistance of adhesive bonds between flexible adherends by means of a T-type specimen using a tension testing machine. The bent, unbonded ends of the test specimen shall be clamped in the test grips of the tension testing machine and a load of a constant head speed shall be applied. An autographic recording of the load versus the head movement or load versus distance peeled shall be made. The peel resistance over a specified length of the bond line after the initial peak shall be determined.

ASTM D3167 Peel Resistance Adhesives Test - Floating Roller

ASTM D3167 Peel Resistance Adhesives Test - Floating Roller


ASTM D3167 Floating Roller Peeling test method covers the determination of the relative peel resistance of adhesive bonds between one rigid adherend and one flexible adherend when tested under specified conditions of preparation and testing.


ASTM D897 Tensile Test of Adhesive Bonds

ASTM D897 prescribed a method for determining the comparative tensile properties of adhesive bonds in a standard specimen when tested under specific conditions. Its primary purpose was to measure the tensile strength of an adhesive bond between two rigid substrates (metal to metal). 

FAQs for ASTM F88 Seal Strength Test for Flexible Barrier Packaging

Q1: What is the core purpose of ASTM F88?

A1: This standard measures the seal strength of heat-sealed or bonded flexible barrier packaging joints between flexible-flexible, flexible-rigid, or flexible-semi-rigid substrates. It records two key metrics (maximum peak seal force and average stable peel force) and classifies all failure modes to evaluate seal quality, process consistency, and consumer openability of packaging seals.


Q2: What is the difference between ASTM F88 and ASTM F2824?

A2: ASTM F88 tests narrow cut strips sampled from the seal cross-section for lab comparative testing. ASTM F2824 tests full intact peelable lids peeled off round rigid/semi-rigid containers to replicate complete consumer opening of finished trays, not cut strip samples.


Q3: What materials and packaging types fall under ASTM F88 scope?

A3: All flexible barrier materials including plastic films, foil composites, Tyvek, coated paper, laminated multi-layer webs, and flexible lids sealed to plastic/metal rigid trays. It covers lab-made sealed laminates and mass-produced commercial food, medical, pharmaceutical packaging seals.


Q4: What does “flexible adherend” and “rigid/semi-rigid” mean in this standard?

A4: Flexible: Easily bent film/foil without permanent deformation (e.g., LDPE, PET, Tyvek).

Semi-rigid: Light trays that bend slightly under load but rebound to original shape (form-fill-seal plastic trays).

Rigid: Stiff substrates that do not flex during testing (thick injection-molded plastic, metal trays).


Q5: How do I calculate average seal strength correctly per ASTM F88?

A5: Ignore the first 10% (initial force ramp-up) and final 10% (post-failure drop) of the full peel curve; only use the stable central 80% segment for average force calculation. If separation occurs via substrate tearing (not seal peeling), average strength values are not reported as they do not represent true seal performance.


Q6: Why must I record which material is clamped to moving vs stationary grip?

A6: Material flexibility imbalance alters peel angle and measured seal strength. The less flexible substrate must mount to the moving crosshead to achieve uniform peeling; reversing this setup creates inconsistent, biased results that cannot be cross-compared.


Q7: Can I switch between Technique A and B for the same material batch?

A7: No. Peel geometry directly impacts strength readings. All comparative testing must use one fixed technique only; switching methods invalidates side-by-side performance comparisons. The report must clearly state the selected technique and any custom fixtures used.


Q8: What standard specimen widths are allowed?

A8: Approved widths: 15 mm, 25 mm, or 25.4 mm (1 inch, preferred). All results must be normalized to force per unit width (N/m or lbf/in) to eliminate width bias when comparing different sample sizes.


Q9: How many replicate specimens do I need to test per seal location?

A9: The standard does not enforce a fixed minimum count, but industry best practice:

Routine QC: Minimum 10 replicates per seal location

Regulatory/medical validation (ISO 11607): 30–60 replicates per location, multiple seal perimeter positions tested separately

Interlaboratory round-robin testing: 30 samples per material group as specified in precision studies.


Q10: What rules apply when cutting specimens from rigid trays with flexible lids?

A10: Two acceptable cutting methods:

Cut fully through both flexible lid and rigid flange;

Slice only the flexible lid while leaving the rigid tray flange intact.

All comparative testing must use identical cutting methods, and edge specimens must be labeled separately in reports as they often show different strength values.


Q11: What are the standard failure modes defined in ASTM F88, and what do they mean?

A11: Adhesive Peel: Clean separation at the seal interface (ideal for peelable consumer packaging).

Cohesive Peel: Split within the heat-sealant layer (indicates strong substrate-sealant bonding).

Delamination: Internal splitting of multi-layer film laminates (signals defective film material).

Material Break / Remote Break: Film tears outside the sealed zone (test interference, not true seal failure).

Material Elongation: Excessive stretching of flexible tails during peeling (skews measured peel rate).


Q12: What tensile machine speed is mandatory for ASTM F88?

A12: Fixed range: 200–300 mm/min (8–12 in/min). Interlaboratory studies confirm no meaningful strength difference within this speed window, but speed must remain constant for all samples in one test group and fully documented in reports.


Q13: What equipment accuracy requirements does the standard specify?

A13: Tensile tester load and displacement measurement must be accurate to ±2% full scale. The machine must generate force vs grip travel curves and calculate average force over a programmable curve segment. Custom alignment/tray fixtures are permitted to reduce specimen sway and variability.


Q14: What is the key difference between ASTM F88 and ISO 11339?

A14: ASTM F88: Focused on thermal heat-sealed packaging seals, three flexible peel geometries (A/B/C), tests flexible-flexible/rigid/semi-rigid packaging barrier strips, packaging QC oriented.

ISO 11339: T-peel test for structural adhesive-bonded flexible assemblies (thin metal foils, composite laminates), fixed T-shaped peel geometry, designed for structural adhesive performance testing, not heat-sealed packaging seals


Q15: Why must I report edge-cut specimens separately from central strip specimens?

A15: Seal formation at package flange edges often produces inconsistent heat distribution, leading to different seal strength values compared to central seal areas. Separating edge sample data avoids skewing overall batch average strength results and complies with standard reporting rules.


Q16: What units should I report final seal strength results in?

A16: Dual independent unit systems (SI and imperial) are recognized; do not mix units for compliance. Standard reporting units:

Metric: N/m (newtons per meter width)

Imperial: lbf/in (pound-force per inch width)

Raw peak force (N/lbf) for each specimen is also required for full reporting.


Q17: Does ASTM F88 provide official repeatability and reproducibility (r & R) data?

A17: Yes, full interlaboratory round-robin data exists for both flexible-flexible and flexible-rigid sample configurations with published r (same-lab repeatability) and R (cross-lab reproducibility) limits at 95% confidence. No certified reference material is available to quantify test bias, so no bias statement is provided.


Q18: What counts as a test interference that must be documented?

A18: Any factor altering measured seal strength: film elongation, tail flipping during pulling, uneven/curved rigid tray flanges, inconsistent initial grip separation distance, heavy hand pressure during Technique B testing, pre-damaged seal edges from cutting. All interferences must be noted in the test report alongside data.


Q19: Why is ASTM F88 testing critical for flexible barrier packaging materials?

A19: Guarantee package integrity: Verifies minimum seal strength to prevent accidental rupture during transit, sterilization, storage, and shelf life, avoiding contamination risks for medical devices and food products.

Control consumer opening force: Defines upper strength limits for peelable packaging to ensure easy manual opening without tools, balancing seal robustness and user convenience.

Heat-seal process validation: Validates consistency of sealing machine parameters (temperature, pressure, dwell time) to eliminate batch-to-batch seal strength variation in mass manufacturing.

Root-cause failure analysis: Standardized failure mode classification distinguishes weak sealant coating, poor heat fusion, or defective substrate film, guiding targeted process/material improvements.

Regulatory compliance: Mandatory test method for medical device packaging ISO 11607 validation; accepted by FDA, EU medical regulators, and cross-border food packaging quality audits.

Comparative material R&D benchmarking: Uniform test geometry, speed, and peel techniques enable fair side-by-side evaluation of different sealant coatings, film laminates, and substrate combinations.

Risk mitigation: Identifies under-sealed weak joints before finished goods distribution, reducing product waste, contamination risks, and costly product recalls.


Q20: Which industries rely most heavily on ASTM F88 testing?

A20: Medical sterile packaging (Tyvek, foil, plastic pouches for ISO 11607 compliance)

Food & beverage flexible packaging (heat-sealed snack bags, frozen pouches, lidded food trays)

Pharmaceutical blister/sachet packaging (unit-dose drug foil sachets)

Consumer goods (cosmetic foil pouches, detergent refill bags)

Electronics moisture-barrier packaging (foil-laminated component bags)

Packaging manufacturing QC and material R&D labs.


Q21: What is the main limitation of ASTM F88 testing?

A21: It only evaluates narrow linear strip cross-sections of seals and cannot fully replicate full circular/irregular package lid opening (ASTM F2824 required for complete container testing).

Material elongation or substrate breakage interferes with accurate seal strength measurement and must be flagged as test interferences.

It does not simulate long-term cyclic fatigue, environmental corrosion, or sterilization aging effects unless paired with separate conditioning procedures.

Results cannot predict full package burst resistance (use ASTM F1140 for internal burst testing as a complementary method).

< Previous: ASTM E2428 Calibration of Elastic Torque Measurement

> Next: ASTM F382 Metallic Bone Plates fatigue bending test

Require More Customized Solutions?

We offer customization to meet your specific needs. Our expert team will collaborate with you to develop the perfect product for you
Customize Now

Beijing United Test Co., Ltd.