Information on the most widely used ASTM standards within the materials testing industry
ISO 8339 Construction Sealant Tensile Property Tester | UnitedTest
UnitedTest manufactures precision ISO 8339-compliant tensile testing machines built to measure tensile properties including elongation to break for building construction joint sealants in construction material labs and sealant manufacturing QC departments.
ISO 8339 Building construction — Sealants — Determination of tensile properties (Extension to break) establishes a standardized laboratory tensile testing procedure for construction joint sealants. The test stretches bonded sealant specimens continuously until total rupture to capture complete tensile mechanical performance data.
This standard quantifies two critical sealant characteristic metrics: secant modulus and elongation-at-break. These core parameters assess the elastic deformability, adhesive capacity and cohesive integrity of sealants under tensile stress. ISO 8339 implements single-speed tensile extension all the way to specimen failure, which differentiates it clearly from ISO 8340, the standard designed for sustained constant tensile load testing of sealants. Test outputs guide sealant formulation development, joint structure design and finished construction sealant batch qualification.
Core Test Principle
Standardized rectangular sealant bead is fully bonded between two parallel rigid substrate strips (mortar, anodized aluminium or glass).
The bonded specimen is pulled apart at a constant low crosshead speed until the sealant completely fractures (adhesive detachment from substrate or cohesive split inside sealant).
A continuous force-extension curve is digitally recorded throughout the full stretching process.
Two key performance metrics are mathematically derived from the curve:
Secant modulus: Stiffness of the sealant at a defined elongation level (typically 60% or 100% strain)
Elongation at break: Maximum stretch percentage the sealant can withstand before rupture
Post-test visual inspection classifies failure as adhesive (interface separation) or cohesive (internal sealant crack), to distinguish poor substrate adhesion vs weak bulk sealant elasticity.
Test Equipment required of ISO 8339 Tensile Test for Building Sealants (Extension to Break):
| Tensile testing machine | Constant crosshead speed: \(5.5 \pm 0.7\) mm/min Equipped with digital recording system to generate continuous force/extension graphs Grips designed to firmly clamp the outer substrate sections without damaging the bonded sealant joint.
|
| Standard Test Substrates | Three permitted rigid substrate types: Mortar panels (75 mm height, 12 mm thickness) Anodized aluminium sheets Float glass sheets Other substrates are allowed only with written agreement between testing parties. |
| Spacers | 12 mm × 12 mm cross-section rigid spacers with anti-adhesive surface (to define fixed sealant bead thickness and width during casting). |
| Anti-Adherent Base Sheet | Polyethylene (PE) film to support uncured sealant during filling and initial curing; easily peeled off without damaging fresh sealant. |
| Environmental Conditioning Chamber | Ventilated convection oven: Stable temperature at (70 ± 2)°C for accelerated heat-water cycling (Conditioning Method B) Water immersion container: For distilled water soaking cycles at 23°C Refrigerated temperature chamber: Maintains -20°C for low-temperature tensile testing. |
Test Specimen Information:
1, Specimen Geometry
Configuration: Sealant bead cast between two parallel substrate pieces, separated by 12 mm × 12 mm spacers
Substrate materials: Mortar, anodized aluminium, or glass (as per Figures 1 and 2 in the standard)
Spacer cross-section: 12 mm × 12 mm
Anti-adherent backing: PE film or similar, placed beneath the sealant during curing
Sealant bead dimensions: Controlled by the spacer geometry — the sealant fills the hollow volume formed by the substrates and spacers
2, Quantity: 3 test specimens prepared for each substrate type and each test temperature (so 3 specimens × 2 temperatures = 6 specimens minimum per substrate type).
Avoid air bubble formation.
Specimens set on edge to cure; spacers maintained in place during conditioning
Anti-adherent substrate removed as soon as possible after specimen assembly
3, Two Conditioning Regimes
3.1, Method A (Standard Ambient Cure): 28 days at (23 ± 2)°C and (50 ± 5)% RH
3.2, First complete Method A 28-day cure, then repeat three full environmental cycles:
3 days oven at (70 ± 2)°C
1 day distilled water immersion at 23°C
2 days oven at (70 ± 2)°C
1 day distilled water immersion at 23°C
After three cycles, rest specimens for 24 h under 23°C/ 50%RH before tensile testing.
Note: Method B simulates thermal/humidity exposure but does not represent long-term real-world durability.
Test Parameters & Stipulations
| Tensile extension rate | (5.5 ± 0.7) mm/min |
| Specimens per temperature | 3 |
| Spacer dimensions | 12 mm × 12 mm |
| Conditioning Method A | 28 days at 23 ± 2°C, 50 ± 5% RH |
| Conditioning Method B | Method A + 3 heat/water cycles (70 ± 2°C oven ↔ 23 ± 2°C distilled water) |
| Secant modulus rounding | 0.01 N/mm² |
| Elongation at break reporting | Nearest 5% |
Sealant adhesion — Sealant shall be pressed onto the inner surfaces of the substrates.
Surface trimming — Sealant surface shall be trimmed flush with substrate and spacer faces.
Spacer retention — Spacers shall be maintained in place during conditioning.
Test Procedures for ISO 8339 Tensile Test for Building Sealants (Extension to Break)
Step 1 Specimen Casting & Initial Cure
Assemble substrate-spacer mould on PE film, fill cavity with mixed sealant (follow manufacturer primer/mixing guidance), de-air and level sealant surface, peel off PE film after skin formation, cure per Method A or B conditioning schedule with spacers retained.
Step 2 Pre-Test Temperature Stabilization
For +23°C test: Directly take conditioned specimens to lab ambient environment
For -20°C test: Transfer specimens into refrigerated chamber and hold for ≥4 hours to reach uniform low temperature.
Step 3 Machine Mounting
Remove top and bottom 12.5 mm spacers from the cured specimen; clamp the upper and lower rigid substrate ends into tensile machine grips symmetrically, keep sealant bead fully unobstructed between jaws.
Step 4 Tensile Extension to Rupture
Start tensile tester at fixed 5.5 mm/min crosshead speed; continuously record force vs extension curve until full sealant rupture occurs.
Step 5 Post-Test Classification
Visually identify failure mode for each specimen:
Adhesive failure: Clean separation between sealant and substrate surface.
Cohesive failure: Internal crack splitting the bulk sealant material.
Mixed adhesive + cohesive failure (record both percentages if partial separation occurs).
Industry Application Fields
ISO 8339:2005 is used across the building and construction sealant industry:
| Building envelope / Façade engineering | Performance assessment of sealants for façade joints, curtain walls, and cladding systems |
| Windows & doors | Evaluating sealants for window and door perimeters — critical for weather tightness |
| Expansion joints | Testing sealants for building movement joints that must accommodate thermal and structural movement |
| General building sealing | Quality control and specification compliance for all types of construction sealing |
| Sealant manufacturing | R&D and quality laboratories for product development and batch verification |
| Third-party testing & certification | Independent testing bodies and certification organizations |
| Product standards compliance | ISO 8339 is referenced by ISO/DIS 11600 (Classification of elastomeric sealants) — used to determine secant tensile modulus and elongation at break for sealant classification into 25LM, 25HM, 20LM, 20HM, 12.5E, 12.5P, and 7.5 classes |
| Low-temperature performance | Evaluating sealant behavior at −20°C, simulating cold-climate service conditions |
| Heat/water exposure assessment | Method B conditioning evaluates effects of thermal and moisture cycling on tensile behavior |
Related Stadard:
| ISO 8339 | Building construction - Sealants - Determination of tensile properties (Extension to break) |
| ASTM C1135 | Standard Test Method for Determining Tensile Adhesion Properties of Structural Sealants |
| ISO 8340 | Building construction - Sealants - Determination of tensile properties at maintained extension |
| ISO 7389 | Building construction - Jointing products - Determination of elastic recovery of sealants |
| GB/T 13477.8 | Test method for building sealants—Part 8:Determination of tensile properties |
| ISO 10590 | Building Construction Sealants Determination of Tensile Properties of Sealants at Maintained Extension After Immersion in Water |
| ISO 19862 | Buildings and civil engineering works — Sealants — Durability to extension compression cycling under accelerated weathering |
| ASTM C719 | Standard Test Method for Adhesion and Cohesion of Elastomeric Joint Sealants Under Cyclic Movement (Hockman Cycle) |
ISO 8339 vs. ISO 8340 — Side by Side
| Feature | ISO 8339 | ISO 8340 |
|---|---|---|
| Test type | Extension to break | Tensile properties at maintained extension |
| Objective | Measure ultimate strength & ductility | Measure performance under sustained load |
| Procedure | Extend until rupture at 5.5 ± 0.7 mm/min | Hold at fixed elongation (e.g., 25%, 60%, 100%) for 24 h |
| Outputs | Secant modulus, elongation at break | Depth of adhesion/cohesion loss (mm) |
| Failure assessment | Recorded at moment of break | Measured after 24 h sustained extension |
| Role in ISO 11600 | Determines LM/HM classification & elongation grades | Evaluates sustained-load durability |
| Complementarity | ✓ | ✓ |
Keywords: UnitedTest ISO 8339 tester, ISO 8339 sealant tensile tester, construction sealant elongation to break test machine, building sealant tensile property testing equipment, ISO 8339 secant modulus elongation-at-break test for construction sealants, single-rate tensile extension sealant testing machine, difference between ISO 8339 and ISO 8340 sealant tensile test, joint sealant adhesion cohesion tensile performance analyzer, building construction sealant rupture tensile test instrument
Related products and device
Related Standard
ASTM C1135 Standard Test Method for Determining Tensile Adhesion Properties of Structural Sealants
ASTM C1135 measures the tensile stress and elongation behavior of structural sealants when adhered between two rigid substrate panels — replicating the stress state of a structural glazing joint where the sealant acts as a structural link between glass/panel and the metal framing system. Quantify tensile adhesion, tensile stress at graded elongations, ultimate tensile strength and failure mode.
ASTM D1002 is the most widely used standard test for measuring the apparent shear strength of metal‑to‑metal adhesive single‑lap joints under tension loading. It provides comparative data for adhesive selection, process control, and quality assurance in structural bonding applications. It is the most common test for evaluating adhesive shear performance.
ASTM D897 prescribed a method for determining the comparative tensile properties of adhesive bonds in a standard specimen when tested under specific conditions. Its primary purpose was to measure the tensile strength of an adhesive bond between two rigid substrates (metal to metal).
FAQs — ISO 8339 Tensile Properties (Extension to Break) of Building Construction Sealants
Q1: What is the core purpose of ISO 8339?
A1: This international standard defines a tensile test to measure two key mechanical properties of construction joint sealants: secant modulus and elongation-at-break. Specimens bonded to standard substrates are stretched continuously until rupture, generating force-extension curves to evaluate elasticity, flexibility and adhesive/cohesive performance under tension. It focuses on instantaneous full extension to break, not long-term sustained stretching.
Q2: What sealant applications does ISO 8339 cover, and what is excluded?
A2: It applies to all building joint sealants for facades, windows, concrete expansion joints, roofing and glazing. It does not cover industrial non-construction sealants, adhesives or caulks for consumer goods.
Q3: What is the difference between ISO 8339 and ISO 8340?
A3: They are complementary paired standards:
ISO 8339: Continuous stretching until complete rupture, measures secant modulus and break elongation (short-term instantaneous tensile behaviour).
ISO 8340: Holds specimens at fixed constant elongation for extended time, tests creep and stress relaxation (long-term sustained tensile performance).
Both are mandatory for full sealant mechanical characterization under most construction product standards.
Q4: What substrates are specified in ISO 8339 per ISO 13640?
A4: Three standard permitted substrates:
Mortar (standard for concrete joint testing)
Anodized aluminium (metal facade framing)
Float glass (structural glazing)
Other substrates are allowed only via written mutual agreement between testing parties.
Q5: What fixed cross-section size does the sealant bead have?
A5: The standard sealant cavity is 12 mm width × 12 mm thickness for all substrate types. Only the substrate overlap length differs:
Mortar: 25 mm bond overlap on each side
Aluminium/glass: 6 mm bond overlap on each side
Q6: How many replicate specimens are required for a valid test batch?
A6: Minimum 3 identical specimens per substrate type, per test temperature (+23°C and -20°C).
Q7: What three failure modes do I need to classify after rupture?
A7: Cohesive failure: Crack splits entirely inside the sealant bulk (indicates flexible, robust sealant core material).
Adhesive failure: Clean separation between sealant and substrate surface (sign of poor surface adhesion or missing primer).
Mixed failure: Partial adhesive + partial cohesive rupture on the same specimen (must record percentage split).
Q8: Why use anti-adherent PE film during specimen casting?
A8: PE film prevents uncured sealant from sticking to the base mould surface, and can be easily peeled off after skin formation without damaging the fresh sealant bead. Spacers stay in place for all curing/conditioning steps.
Q9: What precautions are required when filling the sealant mould?
A9: Avoid trapped air bubbles, fully press sealant against both substrate bonding surfaces, and trim the top surface flush with spacers to guarantee uniform bead geometry and consistent test results.
Q10: How does ISO 8339 differ from ASTM C1135 (US sealant tensile standard)?
A10: Geometry: ISO 8339 uses fixed 12×12 mm sealant bead; ASTM C1135 has alternative coupon dimensions.
Temperatures: ISO 8339 mandates -20°C cold testing; ASTM C1135 is ambient-only in base procedure.
Conditioning: ISO 8339 provides formal heat-water accelerated ageing (Method B); ASTM C1135 relies on separate ageing protocols.
Regional use: ISO 8339 for global/CE marking construction products; ASTM C1135 for North American building material certification.
Q11: Why is ISO 8339 testing essential for construction sealants?
A11: Provides core design parameters (secant modulus, break elongation) for architects and structural engineers to select sealants matching joint thermal movement tolerances. Low-modulus high-elongation sealants absorb concrete/glass expansion without cracking.
Validates cold-climate performance via mandatory -20°C testing, eliminating risk of brittle rupture in winter outdoor joints.
Clearly distinguishes adhesion vs cohesion failure modes to diagnose formulation or surface treatment defects (e.g. missing primer causing interfacial detachment).
Global harmonised test method for cross-border construction supply chains; accepted for EU CPR (Construction Products Regulation) CE marking technical files.
Enables side-by-side comparative screening of new sealant formulations during R&D and incoming raw material QC.
Accelerated Method B conditioning delivers fast preliminary ageing screening before multi-year outdoor weathering trials.
Production batch release quality control to guarantee consistent elasticity and adhesion across mass-produced sealant cartridges.
Defines maximum allowable joint opening for expansion joint design, preventing costly facade water leakage failures.
Q12: Which industrial sectors rely heavily on ISO 8339 compliance?
A12: Curtain wall & facade construction (structural silicone glazing sealants)
Residential/commercial window and door perimeter sealing
Concrete infrastructure (bridge, tunnel expansion joint compounds)
Roofing and waterproof joint sealant manufacturing
Architectural glazing and insulated glass production
Third-party accredited construction material testing labs
Sealant R&D and raw material formulation laboratories
Q13: What are the main limitations of the ISO 8339 test method?
A13: Only measures instantaneous short-term tensile rupture; cannot evaluate long-term creep/stress relaxation (requires ISO 8340).
Method B accelerated heat-water cycling is just comparative screening and does not replicate decades of natural UV/rain outdoor weathering.
Test results are substrate-dependent; sealant performance on mortar differs greatly from glass/aluminium, requiring separate testing for each application surface.
No cyclic repeated stretching simulation (ISO 19862 cyclic test required for long-term joint durability evaluation).
Single fixed slow pull speed cannot simulate rapid shock movement loads on building joints.
Q14: What mandatory information must an official ISO 8339 test report contain?
A14: Standard reference: ISO 8339:2005
Laboratory name and full test date
Sealant full identification: chemical family, colour, production batch number
Substrate material type (mortar / anodized aluminium / glass)
Primer product details (if applied before sealant casting)
Full description of conditioning (Method A or complete Method B cycling steps)
Secant modulus values per individual specimen + arithmetic average modulus
Elongation-at-break percentage for each replicate + mean elongation
Full failure classification (adhesive / cohesive / mixed) for every test coupon
Any deviations from standard specimen prep or test procedure
Q15: Why is the dual-temperature testing (23°C and −20°C) important?
A15: Building joints experience extreme temperature variations:
Behind dark glazing, sealant temperatures can exceed 70°C
In winter climates, sealants can drop to −20°C or below
Testing at both 23°C (representing moderate/service conditions) and −20°C (representing cold-climate extremes) reveals:
How the sealant's stiffness changes with temperature
Whether the sealant remains flexible enough at low temperatures to accommodate joint movement without brittle failure
The temperature-dependent ductility of the material
This dual-temperature data is essential for selecting sealants for buildings in varying climatic conditions.
Q16: What does the secant modulus tell us about a sealant?
A16: The secant modulus (σ = F/s) measured at a chosen elongation (typically 100% or 60%) indicates the stiffness of the sealant at that deformation level:
Low secant modulus → Flexible sealant that accommodates large joint movements with low stress (suitable for dynamic joints)
High secant modulus → Rigid sealant that resists deformation but may crack or debond under large movement (suitable for minimal-movement joints)
This directly informs sealant selection: high-movement joints (e.g., façade expansion joints) require low-modulus sealants; low-movement joints (e.g., perimeter sealing) can use higher-modulus products.
Q17: How should ISO 8339 results be interpreted for sealant selection?
A17: When evaluating sealant test data:
Check the secant modulus — Lower values indicate more flexible sealants suitable for high-movement joints.
Check elongation at break — Higher values indicate greater ductility and ability to accommodate extreme joint movement.
Check failure mode — Cohesive failure (within the sealant) is generally preferable to adhesive failure (at the interface).
Compare across temperatures — A good sealant maintains reasonable elongation at break even at −20°C.
Consider the conditioning method — Method B results show sensitivity to heat/water exposure, though not true durability.
Require More Customized Solutions?