Information on the most widely used ASTM standards within the materials testing industry
ISO 36 — Rubber, Vulcanized or Thermoplastic — Determination of Adhesion to Textile Fabrics
ISO 36 defines the standardized 180° peel adhesion test to quantify bonding strength between vulcanized/thermoplastic rubber and textile fabrics via stripping separation force measurement. It does so by measuring the stripping (peel) force required to separate bonded rubber–textile or fabric–fabric (rubber-bonded) assemblies, expressed as force per unit width (N/mm). Tells you how strongly the rubber is glued/chemically bonded to the fabric — and where the bond fails — in composite products where fabric reinforcement and rubber coexist.
Test Principle
The fundamental principle relies on 180° constant-speed peel stripping: under controlled ambient and machine conditions, pull apart bonded rubber-textile composite strips at a fixed traverse rate to continuously record stripping force over a minimum 100 mm peeling length. Adhesion strength equals average stripping force divided by specimen width, representing force per unit width needed to split rubber-fabric interface exclusively; rupture inside rubber or fabric base material means interfacial adhesion exceeds base material’s tensile strength. All peeling is performed at nearly 180° separation angle between fixed base ply and pulled separated ply to eliminate bending-induced force deviation.
Definition of adhesion strength: The force per unit width required to cause separation at the interface between the assembled components.
Specific Test Method
Only one core testing approach specified: 180° peel stripping test, split into two specimen preparation routes (product-cut specimen / lab-prepared specimen, new film masking):
Two specimen preparation sub-methods:
1, Specimen directly cut from finished rubber-textile composite products: Cut from the actual article (tire sidewall section, hose carcass, laminated sheet, etc.). Width = 25 mm ± 0.5 mm; length sufficient for ≥100 mm of measurable separation. Cut with length direction parallel to warp (primary) and optionally also parallel to weft for directional comparison.
2, Laboratory self-fabricated specimen: Molded/composed in lab. One end is masked ≈50 mm with pressure-sensitive tape or plastic film to create an initial adhesion-free zone so the two ends can be introduced into the grips without forcing apart a bonded face.
The actual measurement act is the same for both: manual (or scalpel-assisted) initiation of separation → clamping → 50 mm/min pull → record force trace → compute adhesion from the trace.

Test Specimen Information
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Width | 25 mm ± 0.5 mm (if fabric alignment irregular, piece may be cut slightly wider, but the ply to be strippedis cut to exactly 25 mm) |
| Minimum separation length measured | ≥ 100 mm effective peeling distance after pre-separated 50 mm free end |
| Cut orientation | Length direction ∥ warp, width ∥ weft (primary); optionally also length ∥ weft for directionality |
| Thickness reduction | If needed, reduce per ISO 23529 so the separation line stays close to the plane of the clamped strips (prevents the peel from migrating into bulk rubber) |
| Lab prep masking | Pressure-sensitive tape or plastic film masking ≈50 mm to create starter gap |
| Number of specimens | 3 test pieces per direction unless otherwise specified |
ISO 36 Adhesion Strength Peeling Test Equipment & Device:
| Tensile Test machine | Power-driven, suitable dynamometer, capable of constant rate of traverse, linked to an autographic recorder or a computer with graphics/data-acquisition; Must comply with ISO 5893:2019, force measurement = Class 1, rate of traverse = 50 mm/min ± 5 mm/min; |
| Grips | Must hold the test piece and the ply being separated without slippage; must keep strips in the same plane |
| Recorder / Software | Scale large enough for easy trace reading; software must be able to process data per ISO 6133 multi-peak methodology |
| Ancillary instruments | Thermometer for temp monitoring; dimensional instruments for width measurement — both calibrated per ISO 18899 |
Key Test Parameters
| Crosshead peeling speed | 50 ±5 mm/min |
| Minimum effective peeling length | ≥100 mm |
| Standard specimen width | 25 ±0.5 mm |
| Pre-separated free end length | ~50 mm |
| Minimum vulcanization-to-test waiting time | ≥16 h |
| Max interval for lab non-product sample | ≤4 weeks post-vulcanization |
| Max interval for finished product sample | ≤3 months post-vulcanization; ≤2 months after customer receiving goods |
| Buffing-to-test interval (if specimen buffed) | 16 h ~72 h |
| Post-specimen-prep minimum conditioning | ≥3 h under standard lab temperature |
| Peeling separation angle | Approx.180° |
ISO 36 Peeling test Step-by-Step Test Operating Procedure
1, Prepare specimen: For product-cut samples, manually split ~50 mm end ply; use scalpel to initiate separation if tight bonding prevents manual peeling; lab specimens already have 50 mm pre-unbonded masked end ready for clamping.
2, Mount specimen onto tester: Fix unseparated base composite ply on stationary grip and pre-split peeled ply on moving crosshead grip; adjust alignment to eliminate specimen twisting and ensure gripped strips stay on identical plane, maintain ~180° peel angle setup.
3, Start tensile tester at fixed 50±5 mm/min crosshead speed, continuously strip composite for ≥100 mm effective travel while real-time capturing force curve via recorder/PC system following ISO6133 data processing requirement.

4, Stop machine after finishing required peeling length; separate tested parts and identify rupture location then mark standardized failure code (R/RA/AT/RB/T/RT).
5, Repeat above steps for remaining replicate specimens in same test direction, compute final median adhesion strength after finishing all replicates.
Results & Failure Modes
| Code | Meaning |
|---|---|
| R | Failure in the rubber layer |
| RA | Separation between rubber and adhesive |
| AT | Separation between adhesive and fabric |
| RB | Failure in the rubber bond between two fabric plies |
| T | Failure in the fabric itself |
| RT | Separation between rubber and fabric (no adhesive present) |
Industry Fields (Applications)
ISO 36 is used wherever rubber is structurally bonded to textile reinforcement and the integrity of that interface determines product life:
| Industry / Sector | Typical Products |
|---|---|
| Automotive | Tires (carcass/filler/buffer plies), engine mounts with fabric facing, rubber–textile seals and boots |
| Industrial rubber goods | Rubber hoses with textile braid/reinforcement, expansion joints, diaphragms |
| Footwear | Rubber sole–textile upper bonding, insole laminates |
| Civil / Construction | Rubber–fabric roofing membranes, rubber liners with scrim backing, waterproofing composites |
| Defense / Aerospace | Reinforced elastomeric composites, fabric-backed rubber track pads |
| R&D / Materials development | Screening rubber compounds, bonding agents/RFL dips, fabric surface treatments |
Related Standards
| ASTM D413 | Standard Test Methods for Rubber Property—Adhesion to Flexible Substrate |
| JIS K 6256-1 | Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic -- Determination of adhesion strength -- Part 1: Adhesion to textile fabric |
| GB/T 532 | Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic - Determination of adhesion to textile fabric |
| ISO 252 | Covers textile conveyor belts adhesion — also excluded from ISO 36 |
| ISO 2411 | Covers coated fabrics (rubber/plastic coating adhesion) |
Related products and device
Related Standard
ISO 252 specifies two test methods (A and B) for measuring adhesion strength between the constituent layers of conveyor belts: between top/bottom covers and carcass, and between individual plies.
ISO 37 and ASTM D412 are both widely recognized tensile test methods designed to evaluate the stress-strain characteristics of various rubber materials, including natural rubber, synthetic rubber, silicone rubber, and thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs). While both standards aim to determine the tensile properties of rubber and elastomers, they differ in their specific methodologies and applications.
ISO 34-1 specifying tear strength testing for vulcanized and thermoplastic rubber, include three conventional specimen (trouser, angle, crescent) for regular-size rubber samples. Tear strength is a fundamentally different property from tensile strength.
ISO 8510-2: Adhesives — Peel test for a flexible-bonded-to-rigid test specimen assembly Part 2: 180° peel.
ISO 8510-2 specifies the 180-degree peel adhesion test for evaluating the adhesive peel strength of bonded materials. This standard is essential in industries such as packaging, medical devices, electronics, and adhesives, where strong and reliable adhesion is crucial. The test provides critical insights into the performance and durability of adhesives by measuring the force required to separate a flexible adherend from a rigid adherend under controlled conditions.
Testing Procedure:
The rigid adherend is clamped into the machine’s fixed grip.
The flexible adherend is clamped into a self-aligning grip.
The machine applies force parallel to the bonded plane, pulling the flexible adherend at a 180-degree angle.
ISO 283 is the core tensile test standard for textile-reinforced conveyor belts. It specifies how to cut a full-thickness test piece from the belt and pull it in uniaxial tension until rupture, to determine the Full-thickness tensile strength, Elongation at break, Elongation at the reference force (load).
ASTM C794: Standard Test Method for Adhesion-in-Peel of Elastomeric Joint Sealants
ASTM C794 test method covers a laboratory procedure for determining the strength and characteristics of the peel properties of a cured-in-place elastomeric joint sealant, single- or multicomponent, for use in building construction.
FAQs for ISO 36 Rubber-to-Textile Adhesion Peel Test
Q1: What is ISO 36:2020?
A: ISO 36:2020 is an international standard that specifies a method for measuring the adhesion strength between vulcanized or thermoplastic rubber and textile fabrics. It uses a stripping (peel) test to quantify the force required to separate bonded rubber–textile or fabric–fabric assemblies, expressed in newtons per millimeter (N/mm).
Q2: Why is the ISO 36 test important?
A: The bond between rubber and textile reinforcement is often the weakest point in composite products like tires, hoses, and footwear. ISO 36 provides a standardized way to assess bond quality, distinguish between adhesion failure and material failure, support quality control and R&D, and ensure safety in applications where delamination could lead to catastrophic failure.
Q3: How are results expressed?
A: Adhesion strength is calculated by dividing the separation force (determined per ISO 6133 multi‑peak analysis) by the specimen width, reported as the median of three test pieces in N/mm. Failure mode is classified using codes: R (rubber failure), RA (rubber–adhesive separation), AT (adhesive–fabric separation), RB (rubber bond failure), T (fabric failure), RT (rubber–fabric separation without adhesive).
Q4: Can ISO 36 be used for curved surfaces?
A: Yes, but only if the internal diameter is greater than approximately 50 mm. It is not applicable for surfaces with sharp bends, angles, or gross irregularities that cannot be excluded when cutting test pieces.
Q5: Which rubber-fabric products are eligible/ineligible for ISO36 test?
A: Applicable: Flat bonded rubber-fabric composite or cylindrical samples with inner diameter>50 mm (automotive tire carcass, fabric-reinforced rubber hose, rubber damping sheet).
Not applicable: Samples with sharp folds/abrupt irregular bends; coated fabrics (test per ISO 2411); industrial textile conveyor belts (test per ISO 252).
Q6: What is the required peel angle during testing?
A: Separation angle between fixed base ply and moving peeled ply shall stay approximately 180°, and gripped specimen strips must be coplanar to avoid oblique peeling and biased force readings.
Q7: Specimen slips out of grips during peel test, how to fix following ISO36 requirement?
A: 1) Use serrated/anti-slip jaw faces for grips; adjust clamping pressure properly to avoid over-crushing specimen edge.
2) Recheck specimen dimension to ensure peeled ply width strictly 25 mm; correct specimen alignment to eliminate twisting during pulling.
3) Verify grip performance during routine in-use check as required by calibration schedule.
Q8: Test peel curve has abnormal fluctuating peaks leading to confusing data, what’s the reason?
A: 1) Insufficient data sampling frequency of test recorder/computer, failing to capture instantaneous force variation; upgrade data acquisition rate complying with ISO 6133 curve analysis requirement.
2) Unstable crosshead speed deviating from 50±5 mm/min, re-calibrate tester speed per ISO 5893.
3) Irregular specimen cutting causing uneven interface bonding; remake specimens with precise cutting tools.
Require More Customized Solutions?