Information on the most widely used ASTM standards within the materials testing industry
ASTM C158: Standard Test Methods for Strength of Glass by Flexure (Determination of Modulus of Rupture)
ASTM C158 is a standard test method for determining the flexural strength (modulus of rupture, MOR) of glass and glass-ceramics via bending, covering two core methods (A for flat glass, B for rectangular/elliptical cross-sections) with clear specimen, equipment, procedure, and calculation rules. It is critical for glass engineering as flexural strength directly governs structural safety, design optimization, and compliance with industry standardsNational Glass Association.
Test method and Test Principle:
Glass is a brittle, elastic material that fails due to the propagation of microscopic surface flaws (cracks). Its strength is not an intrinsic material constant but a statistically distributed property dependent on the size and severity of the largest flaw in the stressed region.
The test applies a pure bending moment to a beam specimen until fracture. The Modulus of Rupture (σ, in MPa or psi) is calculated from simple beam theory using the applied load at failure (F), the specimen dimensions (width b, thickness d), and the span distances.
| For 4-Point Bending (Test Method A): | σ = (3F(L - L_i)) / (2bd²) where Lis F=peak load, the support span and L_i is the load span (distance between inner loading points). |
| For 3-Point Bending (Test Method B): | σ = (3FL) / (2bd²) |
Test Method A (Four-Point Bending): The specimen is supported at two points and loaded at two points on the face opposite the supports. This creates a region of constant maximum bending moment between the inner loading points, ensuring failure will occur at the most severe flaw within that uniform stress zone.

Test Method B (Three-Point Bending / Center-Pointed Loading): The specimen is supported at two points and loaded at a single point midway between the supports. This creates a maximum bending moment only at the midpoint. It is simpler but more sensitive to local flaws directly under the loading point.
Four-point bending (Test Method A) is generally preferred for material property determination as it tests a larger surface area and reduces the influence of localized contact stresses.
Test sample information:
Method A (Flat Glass):
| Sample size: | The specimens shall be approximately 250 mm (10 in.) in length and 38 mm in width. The specimens should be at least 4 mm and not more than 10 mm in thickness. The variation in width or thickness shall not exceed 5 % from one end to the other. |
| Number of Specimens | At least 30 specimens shall be used for one test and shall preferably be taken from several sheets, or regions of a single sheet. |
| Cut from sheet stock with diamond/cutting wheel; longitudinal cuts on the same original surface; no original sheet edges as longitudinal sides. | |
| Surface: | Retain original as-manufactured state (no polishing unless specified). |
Method B (General):
The specimen length should be 0.5 inches or 12.7 mm (minimum size). The glass should be at least 9.5 mm wide. The recommended value for the width-to-thickness ratio is 2:1 to 10:1.
ASTM C158 Glass Flexural Test Related Equipment:
| Universal Testing Machine | A calibrated universal testing machine (Recommend UnitedTest Brand) capable of applying a controlled, increasing load (typically in kN or lbf) at a specified constant rate. (Glass Bending Stegnth tester is an electronic universal testing machine, can be single columns or two columns, glass or cemaic bending flexural testing machine the load commonly less 1KN. ) |
| Loading Fixtures | Precision-ground cylindrical rods for applying and supporting the load. The standard specifies diameters and arrangements to ensure proper line contact. For 4-point bending: Two lower support rods, two upper loading rods. For 3-point bending: Two lower support rods, one upper loading rod. ASTM C158 Flexural Bend Testing fixture for Glass Materials |
| Alignment Device | Ensures the specimen and loading rods are parallel and properly aligned to avoid spurious stresses. |
| Micrometer/Calipers | For precise measurement of specimen dimensions (thickness, width). |
| Soft Padding Material | (Optional, but recommended) Thin strips of resilient material (e.g., cardboard, polymer) placed between the glass and the metal rods to distribute contact pressure and minimize contact damage. |
ASTM C158 Glass Bending Test Procedure:
1, Measure the width and thickness of the specimen at several points.
2, Place the specimen on the support rods, ensuring it is centered and aligned. Use padding strips if specified.
3, Apply the load continuously at a constant rate such that failure occurs between 2 and 15 seconds (to standardize for static fatigue). Stress rate 1.1±0.2 MPa/s (10,000±2000 psi/min) until fracture.
4, Record the maximum load (N or lbf) at the moment of fracture and the time to failure.
5, Calculate the modulus of rupture for each specimen.
6, Perform Statistical Analysis: Analyze the data set (typically 10-30 specimens) using Weibull statistics to determine the characteristic strength and Weibull modulus, which describes the scatter in the data.
Related test stanard for the glass flexural:
ISO 1288-3: Glass in building — Determination of the bending strength of glass — Part 3: Test with specimen supported at two points (four point bending).
GB/T 37781: Test methods for bending strength of glass
EN 1288-4: Glass in building. Determination of the bending strength of glass-Testing of channel shaped glass
GOST 32281-3: Glass and glass products. Determination of bending strength. Basic principles of testing
KS L 3110: Test Method for Modulus of Rupture of Fire Bricks.
EN 1170-4: PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS. TEST METHOD FOR GLASS-FIBRE REINFORCED CEMENT. PART 4: MEASURING BENDING STRENGTH, "SIMPLIFIED BENDING TEST" METHOD.
ASTM C1172: Standard Specification for Laminated Architectural Flat Glass.
ASTM C1408: Standard Specification for Heat-Treated Flat Glass--Kind HS, Kind FT Coated and Uncoated Glass.
Why Glass Flexural Strength is Critical for Glass Engineering?
Flexural strength is the fundamental mechanical property for structural glass design because:
Primary Failure Mode: Glass elements in buildings (windows, facades, stairs, floors) and other applications (vehicle windows, display cases) primarily fail due to bending stresses induced by wind, snow, impact, or self-weight.
Basis for Structural Design: Engineers cannot design safe glass structures without knowing its flexural strength. Standards like ASTM E1300 are built upon this data, allowing designers to select the correct glass type and thickness for a given load and probability of breakage.
Quantifies the Benefit of Tempering: The flexural strength test quantifies the dramatic increase in strength from thermal tempering (fully tempered glass is ~4-5x stronger than annealed glass) and heat-strengthening (~2x stronger).
Accounts for Statistical Flaw Distribution: The test procedure and its results acknowledge that glass strength is not a single number but a distribution. This probabilistic approach is essential for achieving a consistent, quantifiable level of safety (e.g., a 8 in 1000 breakage probability for glass under short-duration load).
Quality Assurance: It is the key metric for verifying that the thermal strengthening process has been performed correctly and consistently.
Related products and device
Related Standard
ISO 3341:2000 Textile glass — Yarns — Determination of breaking force and breaking elongation
ISO 3341 specifies a method for the determination of the tensile breaking force and elongation at break of glass yarns taken from packages.
The method is applicable to various types of glass yarn (single, folded, cabled, strands, structures without twist, rovings, etc.). It is basically intended for single, folded and cabled glass yarns having a diameter of less than 2 mm, or a linear density lower than 2000 tex, taken from packages. This test is applicable to various types of glass yarn (single, folded, cabled, strands, structures without twist, rovings, etc.). It is basically intended for single, folded and cabled glass yarns having a diameter of less than 2 mm, or a linear density lower than 2000 tex, taken from packages.
ISO 13007-4 Ceramic tiles — Grouts and adhesives Part 4: Test methods for grouts
EN 13888-2: Grouts for ceramic tiles - Part 2: Test methods
ISO 13007-4 standard describe the methods for determining characteristics for grouts used in internal and external installation of ceramic tiles. These standard specifies the methods for determining characteristics for grouts used in internal and external installation of ceramic tiles.
The strength test for ceramic tiles grouts involves several methods to determine their performance characteristics.
Test methods:
- Determination of flexural and compressive strength;
- Determination of water absorption;
- Determination of shrinkage;
- Determination of resistance to abrasion;
- Determination of chemical resistance.
ASTM C78 is the standard method for determining the flexural strength (modulus of rupture) of concrete specimens using a simple beam subjected to third-point loading. It is mainly applied to concrete for slabs and pavements.
A plain concrete beam of specified dimensions is supported near its ends. Two equal loads are applied at the third points of the span (i.e., at points one-third of the span length from each support). This configuration creates a region of constant maximum moment and zero shear in the middle third of the span. The test continues until the beam fractures. The flexural strength is calculated from the maximum load at failure, the span length, and the beam's cross-sectional dimensions.
ASTM C1674 test method for measuring the flexural strength of advanced ceramics with engineered porosity at ambient temperatures.
Accordance with ASTM C1674 for determining the flexural strength of ceramic tiles using a four-point bend test. The fixture ensures proper support and loading of the tile specimen, allowing for accurate and repeatable measurement of its flexural strength.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on ASTM C158 Glass Flexural Strength Test
Q1: What is the core purpose of the ASTM C158 test, and why is it so important?
A: The core purpose is to determine the Modulus of Rupture (MOR), or flexural strength, of glass. This is the single most important mechanical property for structural design because glass in buildings, vehicles, and products primarily fails due to bending stresses. The data from this test is the fundamental input for engineering standards (like ASTM E1300) that ensure glass is designed with a predictable, quantifiable, and safe probability of breakage under load. Without this standardized test, we could not reliably design safe glass structures.
Q2: Why does the test use multiple specimens (e.g., 10-30 pieces) instead of just one?
A: Glass strength is not a single value; it is a statistical property governed by the random distribution of microscopic surface flaws. A single test tells you the strength of that one flawed specimen, not the material. Testing a large sample set allows engineers to perform Weibull statistical analysis, which yields two critical parameters: 1) the characteristic strength(a representative high-value), and 2) the Weibull modulus(which describes the scatter—low scatter means more consistent, reliable strength). This statistical approach is essential for safe probabilistic design.
Q3: Why is the Four-Point Bend (Test Method A) generally preferred over the Three-Point Bend (Test Method B)?
A: Four-point bending creates a region of constant maximum stress between the inner loading points. This ensures the specimen will fail at its most severe flaw within a significant, uniformly stressed area of the surface, which is more representative of how real-world glass panels fail. Three-point bending concentrates the maximum stress only at the midpoint, directly under the loading head. This result is more sensitive to localized contact damage and a single, unlucky flaw at that exact spot, which may not be representative of the overall material strength.
Q4: Our company produces tempered glass. We test surface compression (with a polariscope) for quality control. Why do we also need ASTM C158?
A: Surface compression measurement (e.g., ASTM C1048/C1279) is a fantastic, non-destructive quality control (QC) check for the tempering process. It confirms the stress level. However, ASTM C158 provides the ultimate performance metric: the actual strength under load. It directly verifies the functional result of that compression. The two tests are complementary: the polariscope ensures the process is correct, and the flexural strength test proves the product performs as required. It's the final, destructive validation.
Q5: How does ASTM C158 relate to international standards like ISO 1288?
A: ASTM C158 (Test Method A) is functionally equivalent to ISO 1288-3 (the four-point bend test for glass). The core principles, formulas, and intent are identical. The main differences are often in the prescribed specimen dimensions, support spans, and some procedural details. For global companies, understanding both standards is important. Data generated from one is often acceptable for certification in other regions, though specific project or product specifications will dictate the required standard.
Q6: Can ASTM C158 be used to test tempered/chemically strengthened glass, or is it only for annealed glass?
A: ASTM C158 is valid for all glass types, including annealed, heat-tempered, chemically strengthened, and laminated glass (as well as glass-ceramics). The standard specifies adjusted loading rates for strengthened glass (80–120% of the estimated MOR, refined after initial testing) to account for its much higher flexural strength (tempered glass has 3–5x the MOR of annealed glass). For laminated glass, the test measures the composite flexural performance of the glass-ply/interlayer system—critical for applications like glass railings and automotive windshields where the laminate structure resists fracture.
Q7: What's the difference for 4 points and 3 points bending test?
Three-point bending and four-point bending tests are commonly used methods in mechanical experiments to evaluate the bending performance of materials, but they differ in test setup and result analysis.
1. Test setup: In a three-point bending test, the specimen is placed between two support points, and a concentrated force is applied at the center or slightly off-center of the specimen, causing it to bend between the two points until fracture occurs. In a four-point bending test, the specimen is also placed between two support points, but there are two symmetrical loading points above the specimen, applying a distributed force rather than a concentrated one. As a result, the bending moment distribution in four-point bending is more uniform.
2. Result analysis: The results of three-point bending tests are typically used to calculate the bending strength and bending modulus of the specimen. Because the loading method is concentrated, the accuracy of the test results may be affected by the position of the loading point. In contrast, four-point bending test results more accurately reflect the bending performance of the specimen, as the bending moment is distributed evenly and the influence of the loading point position on the test results can be eliminated.
Require More Customized Solutions?