Information on the most widely used ASTM standards within the materials testing industry
ASTM F1264 is a standard specification used to describe the design and mechanical function of intramedullary fixation devices (IMFDs). This specification covers IMFDs used for surgical fixation of the skeletal system. In addition to classification, terminology, labeling, and material specifications, it also includes four standard testing methods:
1, static four point bending test method (Annex A1),
2, static torsion test method (Annex A2),
3, bending fatigue test method (Annex A3),
4, bending fatigue test method for IMFD locking screws (Annex A4).
The UTDS series Dynamic/Fatigue Testing machine used for bone needle, bending intramedullary nail fatigue test is mainly used for biomechanical performance testing of various materials, including artificial blood vessels, soft tissues, bones, bone plates, and vertebrae Interfusion device, knee joint, spine Dynamic and static mechanical tests on materials such as column fixators, metal coatings, hip joints, and intramedullary nails, including tension, compression, bending, and torsion.
![]() | ![]() |
Core Scope and Objectives
Four Key Test Methods
The standard includes four core test methods in its annexes, each targeting different mechanical performance aspects of IMFDs:
| Test Method | Specific Procedures | Key Calculations/Outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| Static Four-Point Bending Test | Place the prepared IMFD specimen on a four-point bending fixture. Apply a compressive load at a constant displacement rate and record the load-displacement curve throughout the process. | Calculate the bending strength and bending structural stiffness of the device, which reflect its ability to resist bending deformation under static loads during fracture fixation. |
| Static Torsion Test | Secure the straight and uniform section of a specified-length IMFD specimen in a torsion testing system. Apply a pure torsional moment to the specimen and record the resulting angular deflection as well as the torque-rotation curve. | Compute the torsional stiffness, evaluating the device’s resistance to twisting forces—critical for scenarios where the implanted area is subject to rotational stress (e.g., during limb movement). |
| Bending Fatigue Test for IMFDs | Mount the IMFD specimen on the four-point bending fixture of a fatigue testing system. Conduct a sinusoidal cyclic loading test at a specified frequency. The test stops when the specimen fails, reaches a set limit, or completes a predetermined number of cycles. | Determine the fatigue strength and fatigue life of the main IMFD body, assessing its durability under repeated bending forces during long-term use. |
| Bending Fatigue Test for IMFD Locking Screws | Fix the locking screw specimen on a three-point or four-point bending fixture. Perform a sinusoidal cyclic test at the specified frequency until the screw fails or the test meets the preset termination conditions. | Calculate the fatigue strength and fatigue life of the locking screws. As a key component for securing the IMFD to bones, the fatigue resistance of these screws is vital to prevent implant loosening. |
Recommended Equipment
To meet the test requirements, specific professional equipment is required, mainly including an UnitedTest universal testing machine (for static four-point bending and static torsion tests) and a UnitedTest dynamic fatigue testing machine (for the two fatigue tests). Matching fixtures are also essential, such as four-point bending fixtures for bending tests, torsion grips for torsion tests, and three-point bending fixtures for screw fatigue tests.
ASTM F1264 Intramedullary Fixation Device Torsion & Bend Fatigue Test details introductions:
| Static Four-Point Bend Test Method—Annex A1. |
|
This test method is intended to evaluate the bending strength or bending stiffness of the working length of the IMFD, and may not be appropriate for all situations. When the structurally critical region of the IMFD is shown to be located at the proximal or distal extremity of the IMFD, it may be necessary to evaluate the bending strength or bending stiffness of this region of the IMFD using a different test method. This is because it may not be physically possible to fit the proximal or distal extremity between the inner rollers of a four-point bend test. Structurally critical regions may be identified through such methods as hand calculations, finite element analysis, etc. Screw holes or other interlocking features are typically located at the proximal and distal extremities of an IMFD, and may result in structurally critical regions at these locations. | |
| Static Torsion Test Method—Annex A2. |
|
| This test method covers the test procedure for determining the torsional stiffness of intramedullary fixation devices (IMFDs). The central part of the IMFD, with a straight and uniform cross-section and away from screw holes or other interlocking features, is tested in a static test. | |
| Bending Fatigue Test Method—Annex A3. |
|
This test method covers the test procedure for performing cyclic bending fatigue testing of intramedullary fixation devices (IMFDs). The central part of the IMFD, with a straight and uniform cross section and away from screw holes or other interlocking features, is tested in cyclic four-point bending. This method may be used to determine the fatigue life at a specified maximum bending moment or to estimate the fatigue strength for a specified number of cycles | |
| Test Method for Bending Fatigue of IMFD Locking Screws—Annex A4. |
|
| This test method covers the test procedure for performing cyclic bending fatigue testing of locking screws used for the fixation of intramedullary fixation devices (IMFDs). The central part of the screw is tested in cyclic three-point or four-point bending. This method may be used to determine the fatigue life at a specified maximum bending moment or to estimate the fatigue strength for a specified number of cycles. | |
Application Significance
This standard is widely used in the R&D, production, and quality inspection of orthopedic devices. For manufacturers, it guides the optimization of IMFD structural designs and material selections. For testing and regulatory institutions, it provides a unified technical framework to verify whether products meet safety and reliability standards before they enter the market. By simulating the mechanical stresses IMFDs endure in the human body, the test results effectively guarantee the devices’ stability and durability in clinical applications, reducing the risk of implant failure or secondary injuries to patients.
Require More Customized Solutions?